How the Syrian revolution was hijacked.
The Syrian
Civil War is one of the bloodiest conflict of the 21st century,
raging across most of the country for almost eight years, killing hundreds of
thousands and displacing millions. And it doesn’t look like it is going to stop
any time soon.
It all started at the start of 2011 when Arab
Spring movement was gaining momentum across the region and the peaceful mass
protest around Syria, calling for an end to the socio-political repression and lack
of substantial economic reforms, turned violent when government security forces
started arresting protesters en masse,
using live ammunition and other means of excessive force to quell the movement.
After that the situation spiralled out of control quickly: people took up arms
to defend their neighbourhoods against bands of government loyalists that came to
intimidate, kill and plunder hotspots of dissent. Army helicopters started
dropping barrel-bombs on areas packed with people, causing panic, terror and
killing dozens. Battle-lines were drawn across cities and neighbourhoods and
people who lived side by side for years were now killing each other. The
international community repeatedly demanded that Assad should step down in an
attempt to de-escalate the growing level of violence, but Assad rejected this
by stating that the people who had taken up arms against him were nothing more
than terrorists and foreign agents that would be rooted out and dealt with.
Now almost
eight years later, the war is still going on as it is without any doubt one of
the most complicated conflicts we’ve seen in modern history. and it wasn’t long
before the gloves came completely off and the systematic destruction of ancient
buildings and historic sites, the deployment of heavy weapons against civilian areas, massacres and the usage of chemical
weapons became all too real.
The
question is how this situation spiralled out of control so quickly and isn’t
showing any signs of settling any time soon. In order to take a critical look
at the present, we often have to look back and identify the things that had a
critical impact on the general situation.
When
looking at different aspects of the country, it quickly becomes clear that
modern Syria is very diverse in a variety of ways.
Historically
the region was one of the earliest places where the human race started to build
its first civilisations around 4,000 years ago. It has seen the rise and fall
of numerous empires that wanted control of the region as it was at the centre
of trade routes from every direction. These empires brought with them their own
culture and religion which resulted in a very unique ethnic (Arab, Hebrew,
Turkmen, Syriac, Kurdish) and religious (Sunni Islam, Shia Islam, Jews, Christianity)
demographic composition and is represented in communities all across Syria.
Although
the country is officially known as the Syrian Arab Republic, the structure of
the government shows that the actual power lies predominantly with a minority,
and a select few within that minority. The ruling minority consists of Alawites
which is a branch of Shia Islam and came to power after Hafez al-Assad took
power in 1970, installing a regime where all the important positions in the
military, state security and intelligence were dominated by loyal people from
the Shia community.
This security apparatus was also designed in a way that no high-ranking position had the possibility of gaining enough influence to attempt at a coup himself. It resulted in a leadership that was well insulated, protected by a broad security force that aimed to stamp out any sign of dissent, resulting in a society where one simply had to come to terms with this new way of life or risk everything by voicing his opinion too loud.
This security apparatus was also designed in a way that no high-ranking position had the possibility of gaining enough influence to attempt at a coup himself. It resulted in a leadership that was well insulated, protected by a broad security force that aimed to stamp out any sign of dissent, resulting in a society where one simply had to come to terms with this new way of life or risk everything by voicing his opinion too loud.
When Hafez
al-Assad died in 2000 and his Bashar succeeded him there was a hope that this
new leader would herald in a new era for Syria in which the socio-political
repression would end and necessary reforms would be implemented. Although the
first indications were hopeful as political prisoners were released and steps were taken to introduce certain new
laws, it became clear that the balance of power was to remain unchanged and
that any attempts to do so would resort in severe punishment.
When the
socio-political movement, which would become known in the West as the Arab
Spring, gained momentum across northern Africa and saw several controversial
governments fall, the people in Syria saw a chance for a similar chance and
took to the streets to give voice to opinions and hopes they had to speak about
in small circles behind closed doors for so long. Cities like Daraa, Damascus
and Hama became some of the prominent places where thousands of Syrians marched
for change.
Although
the Assad government initially didn’t seem to take it too seriously, as the
protest marches continued day after day government security forces suddenly
responded by arresting protesters en masse and using force to break up the
groups. When they arrested a number of youngsters who were part of the protest
movement, violence broke out after the situation quickly deteriorated. Military
vehicles appeared in the streets and security forces were ordered to shoot at
the masses with live ammunition.
These
actions were defended by stating that the protest movement in Syria was the
work of extremists and foreign agents who were working to undermine the
stability and unity of the country. There are numerous reports that the Assad
government released extremists from its prisons in order for them to mingle
with the movement and re-establish contact with their own movements. It is by
doing this that the Assad government was able to cause the first rift in the
Syrian revolutionary movement. By injecting extremist elements into the mainly
democratic movement it was able to bolster its claims that extremists were
moving against the state and therefor justifying its extreme measures that
could be seen in the streets. It also caused the opposition to lose coherence
and break up into multiple factions of moderates and more radical groups.
It is one
of the oldest lessons in warfare and is still accurate today: If you succeed in dividing the opposing force into multiple smaller, less effective forces you will ultimately succeed in defeating them.
Throughout
the Syrian Civil War the Assad government would exploit the rifts and animosity
between rebel groups to gain a tactical or strategic advantage where it could
have suffered a defeat. For example, the government would negotiate a ceasefire
with certain groups in one part of the country for then to relocate a
portion of the troops from that front to a another where the situation was
critical. The most recent example of this strategy is, in my opinion, the instalment
of these de-escalation zones across Syria, among one of them in the Idlib
province, the bulk of the Assad loyalists started a new campaign shortly after
to finish the conquest of the Aleppo province and attack territory held by the
Islamic State who was too busy concentrating on the Syrian Democratic Forces
who were working their way through Tabqah and to Raqqa.
By successfully
doing this, the Assad loyalists have secured the majority of Aleppo province,
cut off both the Syrian Democratic Forces moving west from Manbij and the
Turkish backed Free Syrian Army groups from moving south and strengthening its
position and the negotiation table.
= = = = = = = =
= = = = = = = =
If you have any questions, remarks or constructive feedback on the content or my writing, please do not hesitate to leave a comment. I would love to use this platform to interact with people to discuss topics like these and gain new perspectives and improve on my writing skills.
No comments:
Post a Comment